|
July 15, 2010. It has been quite a while(5 1/2 months)
since we have updated this website. However, as we explained on
January 29, 2010, there were three Florida Keys regulatory
taking cases before the 3rd District Court of Appeal. The 3rd
DCA had ruled for the
County in Sutton v. Monroe County on December 23, 2009,
and we were awaiting decisions in the other two -- McCole
and Beyer -- both against the City of Marathon.
McCole and Beyer were argued on February 8, 2010.
Our appeal in Beyer v. City of Marathon was resolved in
favor of the Beyers nine days ago, on July 6, 2010. The
McCole appeal was decided in favor of the City of Marathon
two weeks ago, on June 28, 2010. In addition, our Motion for
Rehearing, in Sutton v. Monroe County, was denied on
May 25, 2010.
We have filed notices of appeal to the Florida Supreme Court
in the Sutton and McCole cases, and have filed
the initial "jurisdictional brief" in the Sutton
appeal. The McCole jurisdictional brief is due in a few
days.
Both the Sutton and McCole cases both
involved situations where the landowner applied for a building
permit and was denied. Both Ms. McCole and Ms. Sutton took no
further action for several years, at which time they applied for
Beneficial Use Determinations. The 3rd DCA has decided (for the
moment) that the four-year statute of limitation began to run on
Sutton and McCole when their building permits were denied,
rather than when their Beneficial Use Determinations were
issued. We believe this interpretation is incorrect, and that
review at a higher level should result in a reversal of the
Sutton and McCole decisions. However, until that
battle is over, we strongly recommend that you NOT apply for a
building permit, and if one is denied, that you seek a
Beneficial Use Determination immediately.
January 29, 2010. As some of our readers know, we have had quite
a time dealing with the dismissals of five regulatory taking
cases in 2007 and 2008, all but one by a single judge, David
Audlin, who has no clue what he is doing. On New Years Eve 2008,
the Third District Court of Appeal reversed two of Judge
Audlin's dismissals, Collins v. Monroe County & the State of
Florida and Shands v. City of Marathon (a Pacific
Legal Foundation case). The government sought to appeal the
Collins decision to the Florida Supreme Court, but that effort
failed on July 16, 2009. We then had a shock when a panel of 3rd
DCA judges decided to affirm Judge
Garcia's dismissal in Sutton v. Monroe County on December
23, 2009. We filed Motions for Rehearing, and for Rehearing
en banc, on January 6, 2010, and the court has not ruled on
either motion yet.
We now have the final two cases in this quintet, McCole v
City of Marathon & the State and Beyers v. City of
Marathon & the State, scheduled for oral argument on
February 8, 2010, at 10:30 AM, before the 3rd DCA in Miami. I
can sense the parochial concerns of the judges when they see a
situation that seems "out of control." They cannot deal with the
concepts that (1) a local government can adopt confiscatory land
use regulations, and (2) that a landowner can wait 500 years
before requesting an administrative 'beneficial Use
Determination" that will "ripen" his or her regulatory taking
claim.
It is unlikely that the strange set of circumstances I have
described above will continue to be available to get just
compensation to affected landowners, for the simple reason that
appellate judges cannot fathom how such a thing can go on, and
on, and on, and on forever. Once we get through the McCole
and Beyer appeals, we will have to focus our efforts on
straightforward attacks on the confiscatory regulations
themselves. We have one case "on hold" for landowners on Big
Pine and No Name Keys, and about 50 more landowners ready to
challenge the County's regulations in a major lawsuit (probably
in federal court). It seems that the time has arrived when we
need to "fix" the regulations, so we can file normal regulatory
taking claims (that can be resolved in less than 10 years). Keep
checking back here for updates.
|
For another source of information on Florida Keys' land use problems,
visit
http://www.mattsonlaw.blogspot.com.
See my August 11, 2009, blog on
Casitas Municipal Water District v. United States, also summarized
below. Property grabs for endangered species create government liabilities
for regulatory takings. The Solicitor General decided not to seek review by
the Supreme Court. Sounds good to me!
|
Try out our new
comment page. You can be added to the mailing list for
The Voice of Reason, send the webmaster a comment on the website, request
a telephone or in-person appointment, etc.
|